Can Zuckerberg Ban All Political Ads on Facebook?

Can Zuckerberg Ban All Political Ads on Facebook?

Too many Democrats are placing their ads attacking President Donald Trump, and too many Republicans getting thrown in Facebook jail for supporting the president and posting the truth about Democrats. There is circulation going around that Facebook may ban all political ads.  Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are under attack for what is claimed to be false political ads, and it is in question if it is Facebook’s responsibility to filter out the ads.  A survey was taken where it shows 71 percent of Facebook users want the ads to be fact-checked before posting.  Low and behold, those 71 percent are Democrats.

The results show Republicans are not as concerned as the Democrats are simply because Conservatives are more likely to post the truth.  That is why we can find most of us as Conservatives landing in Facebook Jail for thirty days, give or take a few days or weeks.  Apparently, snowflakes get offended with the truth of the Left’s policies brought to light.  So what does Facebook want to do?  They want to ban all political ads and say it is most Americans who agree the advertisements should not be posted at all.  Go figure.

Results also show there are more women to men who are more likely to agree with the ads and more women than men who would rather not see the ads at all.  Either way, Facebook decides to go with this topic, Facebook has already proven they are biased and support the Democrats.  But should Facebook stop all ads, it may turn into a violation of the First Amendment rights to everyone’s Freedom of Speech.

It is highly unlikely Facebook ads would be removed altogether.  Facebook has made a business decision to continue with political advertising and political content, along with what they call “false” political advertising.  Many claim Facebook does not go by what the users want anyway, so the surveys really have no effect.  However, most users have reported there has been a “fact check” device installed within the system.  Only Conservative posts come back as showing false.  This really proves biased of the Facebook team since some sources have stated there were factual events to the political post before it was posted.  Ultimately the posts were rejected and removed.  None of the Democratic posts were touched by the fact check system.

On a few occasions, Zuckerburg was grilled by Congress for breach of the Privacy Act, now he is facing the Democratic Congress who cannot stand to be exposed.  The dumbest of the dumb Democrats, AOC, was the one to question the Facebook CEO.  That was a joke, as it was intelligence versus stupidity.  Mark Zuckerburg is no fool, as he has created the most used app in the world and is a billionaire for doing so.

If Congress were to get their way, this would put all of the Democrats in charge of what is posted on Facebook, giving them complete control over the social media app.  Reports show it was a tense exchange between the two parties.  Many say the “grilling” was a waste of time due to the lack of experience with the freshman Congresswoman and her stupid questions.  It proved no point at all to anyone in the chamber or the public.

The main issue which was relevant asked by AOC and answered by Zuckerburg, was only one question.  AOC asked, “Is there any threshold where the company will fact-check ads, or whether a politician could, via Census data, target predominantly black zip codes to advertise?  To which Zuckerburg replied, “The company would take that content down if it included a call for violence, could risk imminent harm or encouraged voter suppression.”

Out of the entire questioning, that was the only one that made sense.  Zuckerburg gave AOC the answer to her question, and she revised the question again and asked the question in the same manner as if she was important.  She asked, “Do you see a problem here with a complete lack of fact-checking on political advertisements?  So you will take down lies or you won’t take down lies? I think this is a pretty simple, yes or no.”

He answered her question several times over until it dawned on him it was the same question.  The reports from the media made her look like she knew what she was doing while making the Facebook CEO seem like a fool.  In reality, we as Conservatives can clearly see, she had no business up there.

editor

12 thoughts on “Can Zuckerberg Ban All Political Ads on Facebook?

  1. Advertisements are not free speech. They are PAID propaganda sent to the masses to alter their view of a person, an item, or a company. The reason Facebook will not take them down is the loss of revenue.
    If people would realize that they are just the media for the advertisement, then the fault would be on the maker of the advertisement. I cannot understand why they complain about Facebook wanting to limit the types of ads they allow to be posted, when EVERY media outlet chooses the ads they allow. Television channels choose the ads they air. Hell, the NFL banned an ad from airing during the Superbowl and the broadcast company bowed down to them. There was no mainstream media outrage for that. Nascar is now doing the same thing.
    They (advertisers) are ok with censorship of certain things, but when it has to do with lies and falsehoods, they want their propaganda to spread like wildfire.

    1. And you can bet your last crying dime that the minute the Elections are over
      they will reinstate the advertising for any and all who care to use it.
      B/S Zuckerburg is just doing his share to hurt our President.

  2. We the SHEEPle are not as stupid as the advertisers / Democrats may think.
    Americans (those who have read and understood history and its’ link to the present events) can make their own decisions as they have for 250+. The deliberate reduction of printed matter is scary enough, though, leaving the well to do layer of society the privilege of control via technology. Nothing is new under the sun.

  3. Some black woman was asking Zuckerberg how many blacks use Facebook. She was told that he didn’t know because Facebook does not collect that type of information, users are free to fill out their profile however they wish. The congress person got upset with him and told him he needed to read about the concerns of blacks. I don’t think she understands that Facebook is global.

  4. When is Negro Smolia Bitch Ohmar going to be Deported to Shithole Country. These Animal must be removed from U.S.A. We don”t need this Animals in any office. There are many like her in Governments offices must be Abolished now. GOD BLESS U.S.A.

  5. As far as I’m concerned ALL political stuff needs to be removed. We get plenty of information(true or false) from the news media. This all puts people hating each other and many arguments that take up valuable space. An exception could be the actual outcome of the election in 2020. Many have left facebook due to this crap. People get bashed all the time for their ‘freedom of speech.’ What also needs to end is the vicious comments about our president. They need to check such posts and not post if offensive to ANYONE.

  6. Phukerburg is clearly a terrorist against true American. He will help any terrorist who wants it as long asit hurts Americans

  7. I have been in Facebook jail for over 150 days because I posted the absolute truth about the Banana Republic Democrats of the United States of America, for their excuse of “It doesn’t follow their ‘Community Standards’ of the Democratic Party of Communism / Socialism.

  8. I’m not quite sure why the Democrat’s are going thru the Dog and Phony show i guess for Bias Media to give them something to bash Trump with.They were running out of the Russian Hoax coverage so they needed another source of leak’s. It will be interesting to see what will happen when the IG report is released and what Pop his gum”s Schiff will have to say.

  9. What is to stop Mark Zuckerberg from banning all political advertisements on Facebook? The main thing would be inability establish an advertisement classification system, so as to efficiently genuinely distinguish between political advertisements and non-political advertisements. Likely no such inability exists.

    The legality of it is a whole other question. If nothing about the ban constitutes a breach of contract or a defrauding of parties to/of/with Facebook, then it is unquestionably lawful. Even if there would be violations in that sense, they would not be crimes and thereby subject to nothing further than rectification in civil courts of law (including out-of-court settlements), meaning compensations taking a largely monetary form or involving the transfer of property, or meaning possibly amendments to Facebook policy.

  10. I wanted to send you the bit of remark to give thanks over again for all the unique methods you have shared above. It is really tremendously generous of people like you to allow easily all that many people could have offered as an e-book to make some profit for their own end, primarily seeing that you might have tried it if you decided. The points as well worked to be the fantastic way to understand that the rest have the same zeal really like mine to grasp lots more related to this matter. I believe there are some more pleasurable periods up front for those who examine your blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!