Biden Picks Hardcore Racist as New Civil Rights Chief…Blacks Are the Superior Race
As Joe Biden continues to announce his cabinet picks the nation looks on in shock and horror at his choices. Yet none of Biden’s selections have been as controversial as who he just tapped as America’s new Civil Rights Chief.
As a student at Harvard University, Kristen Clarke, in cahoots with a known anti-semite, organized an event to show how scientific research has proven Blacks to be the superior race, above all others.
Clarke, in 1994, sent a letter to Harvard’s student newspaper criticizing noted political scientist Charles Murray for his authored book, “The Bell Curve,” which placed all races on equal footing. Her letter was titled, “The Genetic Differences Between Black and Whites,” and the words contained within had absolutely no scientific bearing.
Clarke claimed that Blacks have a different level of melanin which gives them increased abilities bordering on superpowers. The abundance of the chemical causes Blacks to possess a higher level of cognitive ability. The letter said that Blacks clearly present physical superiority and that they exist on a higher spiritual plane than other races.
“Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities—something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards,” the letter stated.
Considering how these words were scribed 25 years ago, some might be tempted to cut the lady a break. Let bygones be bygones and all that. She was just another young student with wild ideas. They’re a dime a dozen.
It should be pointed out how some of Donald Trumps’ appointees were raked over fiery coals for far lesser things they did as college students, like drinking beer, but let’s keep the focus on Clarke at least for the moment.
If Clarke is confirmed, which she no doubt will be, she will become the omnipotent enforcer of America’s civil-rights statutes. She’ll see to it that things get done the right way, according to her. She’ll shape new laws and strategies. And she owes it all to that extra drop of melanin. A little ‘dab’ll’ do ya.
Clarke faced immense fire from Harvard’s Jewish students for inviting the anti-Semitic, Tony Martin, on campus. She did so while in her role as president of Harvard’s Black Students Association. Martin, who taught Africana studies at Wellesley College, promoted outlandish theories with no known basis.
Martin’s self-published book, because no reputable publisher would dare to touch it, “The Jewish Onslaught,” was a Looney-Tunes piece of rubbish. In his book, he said that Jews were responsible for a global slave trade that only they were aware of. It had been going on for centuries undetected. The book was condemned by his own colleagues at Wellesley.
As a rebuttal to the backlash she had received, Clarke issued the following statement. “Professor Martin is an intelligent, well-versed Black intellectual who bases his information of [sic] indisputable fact.”
On both sides of the House, senators relentlessly interviewed and examined virtually every one of Trump’s appointees. They were called on the carpet for even the slightest of infractions, even as young students.
When Ryan Bounds was in line to fill a seat on the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a group of left-wingers stepped into the picture. They circulated some opinion pieces Bounds had written while still green behind the ears as a student at Stanford. The pieces had to do with race-based student groups and multicultural initiatives. If they sound innocent it’s because they were.
Need we discuss the SCOTUS nomination of one Mr. Brett Kavanaugh? We witnessed the man being torn to shreds over false allegations. To the point of bringing him to tears, which there was no shame in.
Clarke absolutely deserves the identical treatment, and it needs to be televised. Conservatives need to object. Jim Jordan needs to stare her down and coyly chuckle at her answers. You know what they say about the gander.